Features of Legal Regulation of the Circulation Order of Gift Certificates
The article analyzes the novels of the legislation of the Republic of Belarus concerning the procedure for using gift certificates when selling goods (performance of works, rendering services). It has been done a comparative analysis of the legal regulation of the procedure for circulation of gift certificates in the Republic of Belarus, Ukraine and some foreign countries (Canada, the USA). The author raises some problems concerning the use of a gift certificate in civil circulation. It is pointed out that there is uncertainty both in the theory of civil law and at the level of legislative regulation regarding the civil law nature of a gift certificate. It is noted that the analysis of the legislation in force in the Republic of Belarus allows us to define a gift certificate as a document certifying the property right (requirement) of its holder (bearer) to receive goods (works, services), and the amount of money contributed when purchasing a gift certificate, as advance payment (advance payment). At the same time, such an approach of the legislator is criticized due to the fact that there is a clear contradiction to the requirements of Art. 402 of the Civil Code of the Republic of Belarus, from the content of which it follows that the advance payment presupposes the existence of a contract in which the subject has been agreed, which is not typical of most gift certificates, due to the fact that they do not contain an indication of the subject of the contract. Having done the analysis of the civil legislation of Ukraine, the author makes a conclusion that there is application of the rules on a purchase agreement to gift certificates, the subject of which may be property rights in accordance with the Civil Code of Ukraine. The conclusion is made about the imperfection of the legal regulation of the procedure for circulation of gift certificates in the Republic of Belarus and Ukraine, as well as about the complex legal nature of the gift certificate, regarding which legal regulation should be more universal, defining a gift certificate as an independent object of civil legal relationship.
Mahota, E. N. (2012) Poryadok primeneniya podarochnogo sertifikata v torgovle. Nalogovyj vestnik, 11, 26–37.
Nac. centr pravovoj inform. Respubliki Belarus (2019) Grazhdanskij kodeks Respubliki Belarus : prinyat Palatoj predstavitelej 28.10.1998 g., odobr. Sovetom Respubliki 19.11.1998 g. ETALON. Zakonodatelstvo Respubliki Belarus.
Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy (2003) Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 16.01.2003 r. № 435–IV. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy. https://bit.ly/2KgaolK.
Krupelnickij, V. (2014, March 17) Pravovye osnovy vypuska, obrasheniya i ispolzovaniya podarochnyh sertifikatov. YuRLIGA. https://bit.ly/2KfDykP.
Dubrovskaya, I. I. (2014) Podarochnyj sertifikat kak istochnik obyazatelstv, srok ispolneniya kotoryh opredelen momentom vostrebovaniya. Pravovedenie, 1 (312), 85–108.
Nac. centr pravovoj inform. Respubliki Belarus (2019) O nekotoryh merah po zashite prav potrebitelej : postanovlenie Soveta Ministrov Respubliki Belarus ot 22.12.2018 g. № 935. ETALON. Zakonodatelstvo Respubliki Belarus.
Nac. centr pravovoj inform. Respubliki Belarus (2019) O zashite prav potrebitelej : Zakon Respubliki Belarus ot 09.01.2002 g. № 90-Z. ETALON. Zakonodatelstvo Respubliki Belarus / Nac. centr pravovoj inform. Resp. Belarus. Minsk, 2019.
U.S. Government Publishing Office (2009) Credit card accountability responsibility and disclosure act of 2009. Public Law 111-24, 111th Congress. https://bit.ly/1eHHWAy.