Serious Consequences Caused by the Crime as an Aggravating Circumstance

Keywords: sentencing, severe consequences, death of victim, significant damage, qualification

Abstract

The judicial practice of sentencing is analyzed in the case when a criminal offense has serious consequences that are outside the objective side of a certain socially dangerous act. Given the evaluative nature of this circumstance and the lack of legislative explanation of its content, there are typical mistakes that courts make in classifying the serious consequences of the crime as an aggravating circumstance. The order of sentencing in the case when the death of the victim was caused by a criminal offense, property damage in large or especially large amounts, etc. was investigated. The procedure for distinguishing serious consequences as an aggravating circumstance and as a mandatory feature of the objective side of the relevant criminal offense is analyzed. It is established that in some cases the task of a serious criminal offense requires additional qualification under other articles of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. The article proposes the criteria with serious consequences of the crime should be considered as an aggravating circumstance. It is established that the grave consequences caused by the crime as an aggravating circumstance do not form a new basis for criminal liability, as the court imposes punishment within the sanction of the article. Also, when the court decides the issue of criminal responsibility of the perpetrator, the signs of the composition of the criminal offense will be crucial, and not the presence of aggravating circumstances. After all, the court must impose a penalty within the limits provided by the sanction of the article containing the elements of a particular offense. It is argued that the main feature that distinguishes serious consequences from other criminal offenses and from other aggravating circumstances is the significance of these circumstances, i.e. the significant strength of influence compared to other circumstances that characterize the severity of the crime and the perpetrator. Recognition of certain consequences as grave and classifying them as aggravating circumstances belongs to the court, which must thoroughly examine the evidence of the occurrence of such consequences and make a final decision.

References

Lemekha, R. I. (2017) Tiazhki naslidky yak naskrizne kryminalno-pravove poniattia. Lviv : Rastr-7.

Pro praktyku pryznachennia sudamy kryminalnoho pokarannia. Postanova Plenumu Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 24.10.2003 r. № 7. (N.d.) Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: http://bit.ly/3qUhJcu.

Shchepotkina, V. V. (ed.) (2019) Ohliad sudovoi praktyky Kasatsiinoho kryminalnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu shchodo pryznachennia pokarannia. Kyiv. Retrieved from Verkhovnyi Sud: https://bit.ly/2NmquhQ.

Slutska, T. I. (19.06.2019) Deiaki pravovi pozytsii Verkhovnoho Sudu z pytan zastosuvannia zakonu Ukrainy pro kryminalnu vidpovidalnist (systematyzovana dobirka) za 2018 rik. Retrieved from Protokol: http://bit.ly/3eLPtXq.

Rishennia Novoaidarskoho raionnoho sudu Luhanskoi oblasti vid 24.02.2014 r. u spravi № 419/287/13-k. (N.d.) Retrieved from Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen: http://bit.ly/30O2Z4n.

Ukhvala Kolehii suddiv Sudovoi palaty u kryminalnykh spravakh Vyshchoho spetsializovanoho sudu Ukrainy z rozghliadu tsyvilnykh i kryminalnykh sprav vid 03.08.2012 r. u spravi № 5-3271km12. (N.d.) Retrieved from Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen: http://bit.ly/2OTSHwZ.

Fedorchuk, I. M. (2017) Obstavyny, yaki obtiazhuiut pokarannia za kryminalnym pravom Ukrainy. Lviv : LvDUVS.

Rishennia Apeliatsiinoho sudu Dnipropetrovskoi oblasti vid 15.11.2017 r. u spravi № 180/1382/16-k. (N.d.) Retrieved from Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen: http://bit.ly/38JnLXu.

Rishennia Kharkivskoho raionnoho sudu Kharkivskoi oblasti vid 02.08.2013 r. u spravi № 2034/13730/2012. (N.d.) Retrieved from Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen: http://bit.ly/2Q28I4q.

Differenciacija otvetstvennosti v ugolovnom prave. (2003) SPb. : Juridicheskij centr Press.

Vyrok Ordzhonikidskoho miskoho sudu Dnipropetrovskoi oblasti vid 05.12.2009 r. u spravi № 1-72/09. (N.d.) Retrieved from Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen: http://bit.ly/3tqRFHH.

Vyrok Khustskoho raionnoho sudu Zakarpatskoi oblasti vid 27.05.2013 r. u spravi № 713/5232/12. (N.d.) Retrieved from Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen: http://bit.ly/3qOvY2x.

Vyrok Khustskoho raionnoho sudu Zakarpatskoi oblasti vid 09.07.2014 r. u spravi № 309/3500/13-k. (N.d.) Retrieved from Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen: http://bit.ly/3qQ7C8F.

Vyrok Fastivskoho miskraionnoho sudu Kyivskoi oblasti vid 19.05.2014 r. u spravi № 381/1337/13-k. (N.d.) Retrieved from Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen: http://bit.ly/3eMPN8i.

Vyrok Vynohradivskoho raionnoho sudu Zakarpatskoi oblasti vid 26.07.2013 r. u spravi № 299/1539/13-k. (N.d.) Retrieved from Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen: http://bit.ly/3eJZCDI.

Vyrok Apeliatsiinoho sudu Khmelnytskoi oblasti vid 12.05.2016 r. u spravi № 686/21565/15-k. (N.d.) Retrieved from Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen: http://bit.ly/3trOwHH.

Vyrok Frankivskoho raionnoho sudu m. Lvova vid 03.04.2017 r. u spravi № 465/3721/14-k. (N.d.) Retrieved from Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen: http://bit.ly/3vuCVJR.

Vyrok Zhovtnevoho raionnoho sudu m. Zaporizhzhia vid 10.07.2014 r. u spravi № 1-kp/331/325/14. (N.d.) Retrieved from Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen: http://bit.ly/3tEgqR5.

Vyrok Talnivskoho raionnoho sudu Cherkaskoi oblasti vid 01.03.2012 r. u spravi № 1-49/12. (N.d.) Retrieved from Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen: http://bit.ly/3cHbqnw.

Published
2020-12-31
Section
Criminal Law; Criminology; Criminal Executive Law