Electronic International Contracts in the Law of Foreign Countries

  • Anatolii ISHCHUK Academician F. H. Burchak Scientific Research Institute of Private Law and Entrepreneurship of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1439-654X
Keywords: Internet, electronic signature, electronic contract, e-commerce


Objective. The purpose of the research is to investigate the legislation concerning international electronic contracts, including the legislation that regulates e-commerce, electronic signatures, and electronic contracts. The research is also conducted with the aim of identifying the peculiarities of the legislation of individual countries that regulate international electronic commercial contracts and to determine to what extent the modern legislation of individual countries is adapted and corresponds to modern trends in e-commerce. Research methods: The work was carried out using general scientific and special methods of scientific knowledge. Results: The regulatory acts of individual foreign countries have been identified, and the content of some of them has been analysed, namely, the UNICTRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce, the EU Directive on Electronic Identification (eIDAS), the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Electronic Commerce, the legislation of the United Kingdom, the United States of America (the US Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN), the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA), the Electronic Signatures and Records Act (ESRA)), Japan (Law on Electronic Signatures and Business Certification) and Canada (Uniform Electronic Commerce Act). International regulatory acts that regulate e-commerce, electronic signatures, and international electronic commercial contracts in one way or another have been identified and characterized. Ukrainian legislation on the same subject of regulation has been studied. The legislation of foreign countries, namely, on electronic commercial contracts, electronic signatures, and e-commerce, has been analysed and briefly characterized. Conclusions. In the context of the study, it has been concluded that in the current stage of societal development, every country that seeks to develop and somehow relates its development to modern technologies has sufficiently developed legal regulation of electronic signatures, electronic contracts, and international commerce. From the very beginning of the implementation of electronic digital data, electronic signatures, and electronic contracts, states have tried to regulate these processes in order to make them as simple, specific, and as helpful as possible to citizens and businesses. The development of legislation in the field of international e-commerce is one of the important factors in the overall development of a state and the formation of a modern and, above all, stable economy of the state. The desire of states to regulate international electronic commercial contracts primarily indicates that the state is interested in its growth, the growth of the economy, and the growth in the standard of living of its citizens.


Global E-Commerce Jumps to $26.7 Trillion, Covid-19 Boosts Online Retail Sales. UNCTAD Press release. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. URL: http://bit.ly/3mR7f1x.

Charts: Ecommerce Share of Global Retail Sales. Practical Ecommerce. URL: http://bit.ly/42h6u1J.

Recommendation on the Legal Value of Computer Records (1985). United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). URL: https://bit.ly/3LlckJB.

UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce with Guide to Enactment, 1996. With additional article 5 bis as adopted in 1998. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). URL: https://bit.ly/3FoQPn8.

UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Signatures with Guide to Enactment, 2001. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). URL: https://bit.ly/403gz13.

United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts, 2005. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). URL: https://bit.ly/3Tof7Uf.

Promoting confidence in electronic commerce: legal issues on international use of electronic authentication and signature methods (Vienna, 2009). United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). URL: https://bit.ly/3JgedVa.

Про електронні документи та електронний документообіг. Закон України від 22.05.2003 р. № 851–IV. Відомості Верховної Ради України. 2003. № 36. Ст. 275.

Про електронні довірчі послуги. Закон України від 05.10.2017 р. № 2155–VIII. Відомості Верховної Ради України. 2017. № 45. Ст. 400.

Про електронну комерцію. Закон України від 03.09.2015 р. № 675–VIII. Відомості Верховної Ради України. 2015. № 45. Ст. 410.

Крегул Ю., Батрименко В., Батрименко В. Правове регулювання міжна-родної електронної комерції. Зовнішня торгівля: економіка, фінанси, пра-во. 2018. № 2. С. 136–147.

E-Commerce Law of the People’s Republic of China (Adopted at the Fifth Ses-sion of the Standing Committee of the 13th National People’s Congress on August 31, 2018). IPKey. URL: https://bit.ly/3yBVRsQ.

Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the Eu-ropean Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part. EUR-Lex. URL: https://bit.ly/3yDGlN3.

Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act. Public Law No: 106-229 (06/30/2000). Library of Congress. URL: https://bit.ly/3ZOfp9s.

Uniform Electronic Transaction Act (1999). Uniform Law Commission. URL: http://bit.ly/3YN8vQr.

Electronic Signatures and Records Act (ESRA) Regulation. Office of Infor-mation Technology Services. URL: https://on.ny.gov/3FpYdim.

Act on Electronic Signatures and Certification Business. Act No. 102 of May 31, 2000. e-Gov Japan. URL: https://bit.ly/3llVWxH.

The Uniform Electronic Commerce Act. Lex Electronica, vol. 6, n°1, printemps 2000. Lex Electronica. URL: https://bit.ly/42h79jJ.

Scassa, Teresa; Deturbide, Michael Eugene. Electronic Commerce and Inter-net Law in Canada. CCH Canadian Limited, 2004. 524 p. Google. URL: http://bit.ly/3lcWFRM.

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act. S.C. 2000, C. 5. Assented to 2000.04.13. Justice Laws Website. URL: https://bit.ly/3yEHeoQ.