Individually-Psychological Aspects of the Conciliation-Mediation Procedure to Resolve Labour Disputes
Abstract
The article investigates the use of conciliation procedures for resolving labour disputes through the negotiation process. The article also reveals the advantages of the negotiation process in conciliation procedures. Tactical methods of negotiations are analyzed, individual psychological aspects of their conduct and interests of the parties to labour disputes are taken into account. The proposal for the expediency of introducing into the labour law the international legal ways of resolving disputes with the participation of a third (neutral) person is justified by fixing the following procedures under the following sequence: arbitration-mediation, conciliation or settlement of the dispute by means of the ombudsman, independent establishment of disputes assessment of circumstances, facilitation, creation of commissions for the settlement of disputes, «court with many doors».
In the process of conciliation procedures the employer, employee and third parties should be involved in the settlement of the dispute, the main task of which is to assist the parties to the dispute to reach understanding and settlement of the existing dispute through the negotiations established by law. It is established that the individual-psychological aspects of the negotiation process are traced in the resolution of labour disputes, the introduction of a third (neutral) person during conciliation procedures.
On the basis of the conducted research it is grounded expediency of normative consolidation of conciliation-mediation procedures in the labour legislation, which will promote reconciliation of interests of parties to the dispute and protection of labour rights of employees.
It would be expedient in labour law to lay down requirements for the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of workers, in particular their physical and mental health, to fix the notion of «mobbing» and measures of liability that can be applied to the offender of the rights and legitimate interests of workers.
References
Petrazhitskiy, L. I. (2010). Teoriya i politika prava: izbrannyye trudy. Sankt-Peterburg: Yuridicheskaya kniga.
Rudenkov, V. M.. Belyatskiy, N. P., & Rudak, I. K. (2012). Vedeniye peregovorov. Minsk: Amalfeya, Misanta.
Moroz, O. V. et al. (2016). Osnovy alternativnogo razresheniya sporov = Basics of alternative dispute resolution. Minsk: BGU.
Matytsina, N. (1996). K sozdaniyu rossiyskoy sistemy trudovogo arbitrazha. Chelovek i trud, 5, pp. 100–103.
Ponasyuk, A. M. (2012). Mediatsiya kak alternativa i dopolneniye. Mirovoy sudia, 9, pp. 8–9.
Hellmann, U., & Bondarenko-Zelinska, N. L. (Eds.) (2017). Vstup do alternatyvnoho vyrishennia sporiv. Khmelnytskyi: Khmelnytskyi universytet upravlinnia ta prava.
Melnichenko, R. G. (2015). Diarezis ponyatiya «konflikt» i mesto v nem ponyatiya «alternativnyye sposoby razresheniya konfliktov». Nauchnyy vestnik Volgogradskogo filiala RANKhiGS. Seriya: yurisprudentsiya, 2, pp. 21–30.
Zdrok, O. N. (2018). Mediatsiya. Minsk: Chetyre chetverti.
Konnov, A. Yu. (2004). Ponyatiye. klassifikatsiya i osnovnyye vidy alternativnykh sposobov razresheniya sporov. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 12, pp. 120–131.
Zabolotskikh, M. Yu. (2014). Ucheniye L. I. Petrazhitskogo o netraditsionnykh formakh prava. Pravo i sovremennyye gosudarstva, 4, pp. 41–48.
Boshno, S. V. (2003). Doktrinalnyye i drugiye netraditsionnyye formy prava. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 1, pp. 82–91.
Yatmanova, M. G. (2012). Vedeniye peregovorov. Strategii i taktiki. Sankt-Peterburg: SPbGU.
Khudoykina, T. V. (2015). K voprosu o vyyavlenii kharaktera pravovogo soznaniya. Perspektivy nauki, 11, pp. 116–119.
Lushnikov, A. M. (2016). Sovremennaya kontseptsiya okhrany truda: sravnitelno-pravovoy aspekt. Zashchita trudovykh prav grazhdan. (pp. 58–67). Grodno: YurSaPrint.
Korobchenko, V. V. (2018). Rol trudovogo prava v zashchite konstitutsionnykh tsennostey. In Lyutov, N. L., & Suleymanova, F. O. (Eds.). Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya «Istoriya i nauchnoye prognozirovaniye razvitiya trudovogo prava i prava sotsialnogo obespecheniya» (Treti Gusovskiye chteniya). (pp. 301–305). Moskva: RG-Press.
Konstytutsiia Ukrainy vid 28.06.1996 r. № 254k/96–VR. (1996). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 30, st. 141.
Kodeks zakoniv pro pratsiu Ukrainy vid 10.12.1971 № 322–VIII. (n.d.). Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: http://bit.ly/3cU2SsU.
Pro zasady protydii ta zapobihannia dyskryminatsii v Ukraini : Zakon Ukrainy vid 06.09.2012 № 5207–VI. (2013). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 32, St. 412.
Proekt Trudovoho kodeksu Ukrainy vid 27.12.2014 № 1658. (n.d.). Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy: http://bit.ly/38NTOTl.
Proekt Kodeksu Ukrainy pro pratsiu vid 08.11.2019 № 2410–1. (n.d.). Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy: http://bit.ly/2xDFHTL.
Pilipenko, N. S., & Shishko, G. B. (2012). Konstitutsionno-pravovyye osnovy sovershenstvovaniya dosudebnogo rassmotreniya individualnykh trudovykh sporov. Vesnіk Kanstytutsyynaga Suda Respublіkі Belarus, 4, pp. 157–165.
Pilipenko, N. S. (2016). Zashchita trudovykh prav rabotnikov pri razreshenii individualnykh trudovykh sporov v dosudebnom poryadke. Zashchita trudovykh prav grazhdan. (pp. 308–329). Grodno: YurSaPrint.
Pro poriadok vyrishennia kolektyvnykh trudovykh sporiv (konfliktiv) : Zakon Ukrainy vid 03.03.2016 r. № 137/98–VR. (1998). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 34, st. 227.
Polozhennia pro prymyrnu komisiiu : zatv. nakazom Natsionalnoi sluzhby poserednytstva i prymyrennia vid 18.11.2008 r. № 130. (n.d.). Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: http://bit.ly/3cXP4xJ.
