Normative-Instrumental Law-Order Constant
The article updates the normative and instrumental component as a permanent basis for the sustainable concept of law and order. In this case, the rule of law is defined as a state of ordering social relations based on law; as an objectively and subjectively established state of social life, based on the regulatory needs, principles of law, and on the democratic needs, rights and obligations, freedom and responsibility of all subjects of law.
The constant and permanent basis of law and order is the sphere of implementation of legal regulations. The sphere of the legal order is the sphere of the legislation. A prerequisite for the existence of law and order in society is the proper exercise of rights and obligations by all legal entities, which, in turn, requires clear legal regulations, predictability and stability of legal regulation. The unambiguous and relatively stable meaning of the concepts used in the legislation should facilitate the effective realization of the rights and duties of the person, and provide the possibility of foreseeing the legal consequences of her actions. Legal rules should be clearly and unambiguously formulated to prevent the possibility of arbitrariness in the enforcement process. However, when using the dialectical approach, the article draws attention to the fact that in some cases the excessive detail of the legal regulation, associated with it the possibility of incompatibility of legislation with the level of development of social relations, its obsolescence and static, can be a source of violation of human rights and, accordingly, a factor that adversely affects the state of law and order in society. Recognizing the rule of law as the ultimate result of the action of positive law, the author emphasizes that its achievement in a modern self-organized society inevitably involves a reasonable combination of both normative and non-normative regulation (carried out on the basis of values formed in society). It is within the reconciliation of normative and non-normative, positive law and order are judged and qualified as meeting the requirements of due diligence - fair or unfair, timely or untimely, appropriate or impractical, nominal or real, progressive or reactionary, etc.
Alekseyev, S. N. (2011). Obshcheye ponimaniye effektivnosti institutsionalno-pravovogo mekhanizma obespecheniya pravoporyadka. Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii, 1 (4). pp. 321–325.
Boichuk, A. M. (2002). Pravoporiadok ta bezpeka osobystosti u hromadianskomu suspilstvi. Trybuna, 9, pp. 37–38.
Vidershtayn, N. (2008). Obshchestvennaya deystvennost prava: tendentsii razvitiya i effektivnost prava v sovremennom obshchestve. Sotsiologiya prava v Germanii. (Alferov, E. V. ed., pp. 82–85). Moskva.
Dudchenko, V. (2005). Antynomii prava v uchenni Hustava Radbrukha. Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava, 3, pp. 38–44.
Kyryliuk, T. Yu. (2009). Pravoporiadok u suspilstvi yak rezultat pravomirnoi povedinky. Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava, 1, pp. 39–44.
Kindrat, P. V. (2014). Otsinka efektyvnosti zakonodavstva: kryterii efektyvnosti. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Ser.: Yurydychni nauky, 4 (1), pp. 19–22.
Kovalchuk, V. B. (2014). Pryntsypy konstytutsiinoi derzhavy v strukturi suchasnoi natsionalnoi pravovoi ideolohii. Universytetski naukovi zapysky, 1 (49), pp. 5–10.
Oborotov, Yu. (2008). Aksionormativnyye nachala pravoporyadka. Suchasniy pravoporyadok: natsіonalniy. іntegrativniy ta mіzhnarodniy vimіri. (pp. 5–7). Odesa.
Timush, I. (2011). Problemy yednosti pryrodnoho ta pozytyvnoho pidkhodiv do dzherel pravovoi normatyvnosti. Visnyk akademii advokatury Ukrainy, 1 (20), pp. 11–17.
Shevchuk, S. V. (2007). Sudova pravotvorchist: svitovyi dosvid i perspektyvy v Ukraini. Kyiv: Referat.