The Influence of the Law of the Country of the Place of Enforcement of the Arbitral Award on the Settlement of Disputes in the International Commercial Arbitration

Keywords: arbitral award, international commercial arbitration, applicable law, arbitration process, public policy

Abstract

The article examines the key aspects of the impact of the law of the place of enforcement of the arbitral award on arbitration and directly on the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards, given the study of doctrinal positions, regulations and relevant case law. It was found out that the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1958 refers to the procedural rules of the country of enforcement to settle matters inherent to the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards not governed by the Convention, establishing only basic and fairly simple formal requirements for the said procedure, which is one of the strong characteristics of the conventional regime of recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards. In light of this, it is concluded that such an approach is moderate and takes into account the impossibility and lack of practical necessity of unification at the international treaty level of procedural features of recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards, establishing only basic principles and requirements. It is substantiated that there are two components of the law of the place of enforcement of the arbitral award, which regulate the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards within the relevant jurisdiction, namely substantive and procedural, which, however, are contained in single legal acts — mostly national arbitration laws. The author emphasizes the crucial role of the law of the place of enforcement of the arbitral award in the material and procedural aspects for the procedure of recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards within the relevant jurisdiction. It is concluded that the unification of material grounds for refusal of recognition and enforcement (in particular, non-arbitrability of the subject matter of the dispute and contradiction of the award to public policy as grounds that can be raised by the competent judicial authority at the place of enforcement ex officio, regardless of reference to them by opposing party), as well as the consolidation of basic procedural requirements and principles is carried out by the New York Convention of 1958, which leaves to the discretion of the national legislature, on the one hand, the settlement of minor aspects of the procedure, but, on the other hand, recognizes its full discretion in determining the limits of objective arbitrability, the content and specific filling of the category of international public policy applicable in the relevant jurisdiction.

References

Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958). (n.d.) Retrieved from United Nation Organization : https://bit.ly/2TsEyGb.

Lew, J. D. M., Mistelis, L. A., Kröll, S. (2003) Comparative International Commercial Arbitration. Kluwer Law International.

Varady, T., Barcello, J., Mehren Arthur, T. (2012) International Commercial Arbitration: A Transnational Perspective. West Academic Publishing.

Born, G. B. (2014) International Commercial Arbitration. Second Edition. Kluwer Law International.

ICCAs Guide to The Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention: A Handbook for Judges. (n.d.) Retrieved from International Council for Commercial Arbitration : https://bit.ly/3jAbOG2.

van der Berg, A. J. (1981) The New York Arbitration Convention of 1958. The Hague, Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers.

Mistelis, Loukas A. (ed.) (2010) Concise International Arbitration. New York, Kluwer Law International.

Di Pietro, D., Platte, M. (2001) Enforcement of International Arbitration Awards. The New York Convention of 1958. Cameron May Ltd.

UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (with amendments as adopted in 2006). (n.d.) Retrieved from The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law : https://bit.ly/31QRM41.

Explanatory Note by the UNCITRAL secretariat on the 1985 Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration as amended in 2006. (n.d.) Retrieved from UNCITRAL : https://bit.ly/31QRM41.

Zakharchenko, T. (2008) Vyznannia ta vykonannia arbitrazhnykh rishen na terytorii Ukrainy. Pravo Ukrainy, 10, 130–138.

Pro mizhnarodnyi komertsiinyi arbitrazh : Zakon Ukrainy vid 24.02.1994 r. № 4002–XII. (n.d.) Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy : http://bit.ly/2Hr8MDn.

Tsyvilnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 18.03.2004 r № 1618–IV. (n.d.) Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy : http://bit.ly/38wLHuJ.

Ukhvala Kyivskoho apeliatsiinoho sudu vid 24.01.2020 r. u spravi № 824/199/2019. (n.d.) Retrieved from Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen : https://bit.ly/3jw4lYF.

Ukhvala Kyivskoho apeliatsiinoho sudu vid 22.06.2020 r. u spravi № 824/66/20. (n.d.) Retrieved from Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen : https://bit.ly/3e4qwE6.

Ukhvala Kyivskoho apeliatsiinoho sudu vid 09.12.2019 r. u spravi № 824/181/19. (n.d.) Retrieved from Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen : https://bit.ly/37MsFDh.

Ukhvala Kyivskoho apeliatsiinoho sudu vid 08.11.2019 r. u spravi № 796/147/2018. (n.d.) Retrieved from Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen : https://bit.ly/3oAvgX1.

Published
2020-02-25
Section
Civil Law and Civil Process; Family Law; International Private Law