Child as a Participant in Obligatory Legal Relations
Abstract
It is determined that, in accordance with the provisions of civil law, the obligation is a legal relationship in which one party (debtor) is obliged to perform a certain act in favour of the second party (creditor), that is, to perform an act determined by contract or law or to refrain from a certain action, and the creditor has the right to require the debtor to fulfil its duty. The presence of a certain number of persons participating in the obligation of the entities of the obligation (creditor and debtor) is a characteristic feature of the binding legal relationship. Scientific approaches and approaches outstanding in the normative legal acts on understanding the concept of «child» have been analyzed. It is proved that in the Civil Code of Ukraine the concept of «child» is used only in some articles (part 2 of article 25, part 1 of article 35, part 3 of article 72, part 2 of article 285, part 3 of article 295, part 1.4 of article 1200 part 1 of article 1242, etc.) at the same time this category is used regarding, that is, when determining the question regarding the legal status of a conceived and unborn child, regarding the personal non-property rights of individuals, regarding the issue of compensation for harm, hereditary legal relations, etc. It is justified that civil law does not identify the concept of «child» with a person before the age of 18. The peculiarities of the child’s participation in binding legal relations, in particular in contractual and non-contractual relations, were studied. The characteristics of the child’s participation in contractual binding legal relations are defined: 1. The child is subject to contractual obligations until he or she reaches the age of 14, as he or she has the right to engage in petty domestic transactions; 2. The child may be subject to contractual obligations at the age of 14, and the scope and capacity of the child is increased; 3. The child has the same rights as other subjects of binding legal relations. 4. Obligatory legal relations involving the child arise in relation to property and personal non-property benefits; 5. Legal facts are the basis for legal relations involving the child. The legislative approach is disclosed regarding the peculiarities of the participation of the child, namely a minor and juvenile person, in non-contractual obligations, in particular in obligations for compensation for harm.
References
Shemshuchenko, Yu. S. (ed.) (1998) Yurydychna entsyklopediia (v 6 t., t. 2: D-Y. 1999). Kyiv : Ukr. entsykl.
Zavalna, Zh. V. (2012) Shchodo pytannia pro yurydychnu pryrodu zoboviazannia. Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava, 2, 147–150. Retrieved from Natsionalna biblioteka Ukrainy im. V. I. Vernadskoho NAN Ukrainy: https://bit.ly/3zCwWUi.
Honcharenko, V. H. (ed.) (2004) Yurydychni terminy. Tlumachnyi slovnyk. 2nd ed. Kyiv : Lybid.
Suharev, A. Ya., Zorkin, V. D., Krutskikh, V. E. (eds.) (1997) Bolshoj yuridicheskij slovar. Moskva : INFA-M.
Busel, V. T. (ed.) (2004) Velykyi tlumachnyi slovnyk suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy. Kyiv, Irpin : Perun.
Shevchenko, Ya. M. (ed.) (2009) Entsyklopediia tsyvilnoho prava Ukrainy. Kyiv : In Yure.
Sloma, V. M. (2019) Rozmezhuvannia poniat «osoba», «subiekt», «storona» v zoboviazalnykh pravovidnosynakh. Vcheni zapysky Tavriiskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. I. Vernadskoho. Seriia: yurydychni nauky, 30 (69), 6, 51–55.
Konventsiia pro prava dytyny vid 20.11.1989 r. (N.d.) Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: https://bit.ly/3y4SEQt.
Yevropeiska konventsiia pro zdiisnennia prav ditei vid 25.01.1996 r. (N.d.) Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: https://bit.ly/36ZJnNV.
Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 16.01.2003 r. № 435–IV. (N.d.) Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: http://bit.ly/2w1seVb.
Simeinyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 10.01.2002 r. № 2947–III. (N.d.) Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: http://bit.ly/3bHJv5O.
Letova, N. V. (2019) Semejnyj status rebenka: problemy teorii i praktiki. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo, 31. Retrieved from KiberLeninka: https://bit.ly/3744w9L.
Ozhegov, S. I. (2016) Tolkovyj slovar russkogo yazyka: okolo 100 000 slov, terminov i frazeologicheskih vyrazhenij (L. I. Skvorcova, ed., 28th ed.). Moskva : Mir i Obrazovanie.
Ushakov, D. N. (2013) Tolkovyj slovar sovremennogo russkogo yazyka. Moskva : Adelant.
Shemshuchenko, Yu. S. (ed.) (1998) Yurydychna entsyklopediia (v 6 t., t. 4: N–P. 2002). Kyiv : Ukr. entsykl.
Shemshuchenko, Yu. S. (ed.) (1998) Yurydychna entsyklopediia (v 6 t., t. 3: K–M. 2001). Kyiv : Ukr. entsykl.
Kapitonova, E. A. (2019) Pravovoj status nerodivshegosya rebenka: novyj podhod k opredeleniyu. Izvestiya VUZov. Povolzhskij region. Obshestvennye nauki, 4 (52). Retrieved from KiberLeninka: https://bit.ly/3i3zHIv.
Kapitonova, E. A. (2010) Konstitucionnye obyazannosti rebyonka v Rossijskoj Federacii. Penza.
Balashova, T. N. (2019) Sootnoshenie ponyatij «Rebenok» i «Nesovershennoletnij» v zakonodatelstve Rossijskoj Federacii. Zakon i pravo, 11. Retrieved from KiberLeninka: https://bit.ly/3l8NWOn.
Lobanova, T. V. (2006) Pravovoe polozhenie rebenka v Rossii i Velikobritanii (Anglii): teoretiko-pravovoj analiz. Ufa.
Kapitonova, E. A. (2020) Dualizm ponyatiya «Rebenok» v konstitucionnom prave Rossii. Izvestiya VUZov. Povolzhskij region. Obshestvennye nauki, 1 (53). Retrieved from KiberLeninka: https://bit.ly/3BFgaGg.
Ihnatenko, V. M. (2011) Spilni rysy y vidminnosti dohovirnykh i nedohovirnykh zoboviazan. Problemy zakonnosti, 114, 54–61.
Kizlova, O. S. (2013) Vykorystannia definitsii «dohovirni zoboviazannia» u suchasnomu zakonodavstvi. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Yurysprudentsiia, 6–1 (2), 30–33. Retrieved from Natsionalna biblioteka Ukrainy imeni V. I. Vernadskoho NAN Ukrainy: https://bit.ly/36XZXh4.
Tyshchuk, N. O. (2020) Dribni pobutovi pravochyny» yak osnovnyi vyd pravochyniv, yaki vchyniaiut malolitni osoby. Prykarpatskyi yurydychnyi visnyk, 1 (30), 59–62.
Belov, V. A. (2003) Zanimatelnaya civilistika: Voprosy grazhdanskoj pravosubektnosti i absolyutnyh subektivnyh grazhdanskih prav. Zakonodatelstvo, 6, 54–59.
Boshytskyi, Yu. L. (2011) Mala entsyklopediia pryvatnoho prava. Kyiv : Kondor.
Bespalov, Yu. F. (2012) Dogovornoe pravo. Retrieved from Institut ekonomiki i prava Ivana Kushnira: https://bit.ly/3rB1fYI.
Kurakin, I. A. (2011) Sootnoshenie otvetstvennosti za pravomernoe prichinenie vreda i obyazatelstva vsledstvie prichineniya vreda. Biznes v zakone, 3, 76–78.
Svystun, L. Ya. (2013) Subiekty zoboviazan za zakonodavstvom Ukrainy. Naukovyi visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav, 1, 205–212. Retrieved from Natsionalna biblioteka Ukrainy imeni V. I. Vernadskoho NAN Ukrainy: https://bit.ly/3i2aHkQ.