No Dispute, No Arbitration? Pre-Arbitration Settlements and Awards on Agreed Terms at the International Commercial Arbitration Court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37491/UNZ.113.11Keywords:
international commercial arbitration, mediation, pre-arbitration settlement, award on agreed terms, existence of a dispute, recognition and enforcement, private-law mechanisms for advancing national interestsAbstract
The article discusses the legality of arbitral awards on agreed terms issued on the basis of a settlement agreement reached through mediation before the commencement of arbitral proceedings at the International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry. The relevance of the problem is determined by the growing role of mediation in international dispute resolution, the increasing use of hybrid mediation-arbitration mechanisms, and the practical expectation of parties that a mediated settlement may acquire enhanced enforceability if transformed into an arbitral award. The purpose of this article is to establish whether the existence of a dispute constitutes a necessary prerequisite for the commencement and conduct of arbitral proceedings, followed by the rendering of an enforceable arbitral award. The analysis demonstrates that arbitration, by its nature, serves the purpose of resolving existing disputes and that the existence of such a dispute constitutes a fundamental prerequisite for the right to apply to an arbitration and for the exercise of adjudicative function by the arbitration tribunal. A settlement reached through mediation before the commencement of arbitral proceedings effectively eliminates the underlying dispute and, therefore, deprives arbitration of its subject matter. Moreover, an arbitral award rendered in the absence of any dispute may encounter substantial obstacles concerning its legal validity, recognition, and enforcement both under Ukrainian law and the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1958. In conclusion, the article argues that the procedure allowing the conversion of a pre-arbitration mediated settlement into an arbitral award on agreed terms fails to guarantee the enforceability expected by the parties. It is therefore proposed that the applicable institutional rules be amended to exclude the possibility of rendering an arbitral award on agreed terms where the parties settled their dispute before the commencement of arbitral proceedings.
References
United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation : resolution 73/198 adopted by the General Assembly on 20 December 2018. United Nations. United Nations Official Document System (ODS). URL: https://docs.un.org/en/A/RES/73/198 (date of access 05.09.2026).
Status: United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation (Singapore Convention on Mediation). United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). URL: https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/mediation/conventions/international_settlement_agreements/status (date of access 05.09.2026).
Про медіацію. Закон України від 16.11.2021 р. № 1875–IX. Верховна Рада України. Законодавство України. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/1875-20 (дата звернення: 05.09.2026).
International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry. Overview of Activities in 2020. Kyiv : ICAC at the UCCI, 2021. International Commercial Arbitration Court. URL: https://icac.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/report_sum_en_2020_draft5.pdf (date of access 05.09.2026).
Mediation Rules of the International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry. Kyiv : International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry. International Commercial Arbitration Court. URL: https://icac.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/Pravila-mediatsiyi_ENG.pdf (date of access 05.09.2026).
SCC Mediation Rules 2025. SCC Arbitration Institute URL: https://sccarbitrationinstitute.se/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/mediationrules_eng.pdf (date of access 05.09.2026).
Contracting States. New York Convention. URL: https://www.newyorkconvention.org/contracting-states/contracting-states (date of access 05.09.2026).
Постанова Великої Палати Верховного Суду від 19.01.2021 р. у справі № 916/661/20. Єдиний державний реєстр судових рішень. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/94803670 (дата звернення: 17.10.2026).
Berger K. P. Integration of Mediation Elements into Arbitration: ‘Hybrid’ Procedures and ‘Intuitive’ Mediation by International Arbitrators. Arbitration International. 2003. Vol. 19, Iss. 3. P. 387–403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/19.3.387.
Shaughnessy P. L. Turning Settlements into Arbitral Awards. Cambridge Compendium of International Commercial and Investment Arbitration / ed. by S. Kröll, A. K. Bjorklund, F. Ferrari. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2023. P. 1486–1512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108304467.049.
Premium Nafta Products Ltd and Others v Fili Shipping Company Ltd and Others [2007] UKHL 40, 17 October 2007. House of Lords. UK Parliament. URL: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200607/ldjudgmt/jd071017/ship-1.htm (date of access 05.09.2026).
United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. New York, 10 June 1958. New York Convention. URL: https://www.newyorkconvention.org/english (date of access 05.09.2026).
European Convention on International Commercial Arbitration. Geneva, 21 April 1961. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. New York Convention. URL: https://www.newyorkconvention.org/media/uploads/pdf/1/0/104_othertreaties-1961-genevaconvention.pdf (date of access 05.09.2026).
Про міжнародний комерційний арбітраж. Закон України від 24.02.1994 р. № 4002–XII. Верховна Рада України. Законодавство України. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/4002-12 (дата звернення: 05.09.2026).
Black’s Law Dictionary / editor in chief Bryan A. Garner. 9th ed. St. Paul, MN : West, 2009. 1920 p.
Recommended Arbitration Clause. International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry. International Commercial Arbitration Court. URL: https://icac.org.ua/en/arbitrazh/arbitrazhne-zasterezhennya/ (date of access 05.09.2026).
Born G. B. Legal Framework for International Arbitration Agreements. International Commercial Arbitration. 3rd ed. Kluwer Law International, 2021. Ch. 2, updated November 2023. Kluwer Arbitration. URL: https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/document/kli-ka-born-2021-ch02 (date of access 05.09.2026).
Exfin Shipping (India) Ltd Mumbai v Tolani Shipping Co Ltd Mumbai [2006] EWHC 1090 (Comm), 17 May 2006. DMC's CaseNotes. URL: https://archive.onlinedmc.co.uk/exfin_shipping_v__tolani_shipping.htm (date of access 05.09.2026).
Amec Civil Engineering Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport [2005] EWCA Civ 291, 17 March 2005. Court of Appeal of England and Wales (Civil Division). BAILII. URL: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/291.html (date of access 05.09.2026).
CDH Fund V Limited Partnership, CDH Grand Cattle Holdings Limited, CDH Investments Management (Hong Kong) Limited, Li Lei and Xiong Fei v CMBICDHAW Investments Limited [2023] HKCFI 760, 15 March 2023. Court of First Instance of the High Court of Hong Kong. Jus Mundi. URL: https://jusmundi.com/en/document/decision/en-fund-cattle-management-li-lei-and-xiong-fei-v-cmb-decision-of-the-court-of-first-instance-of-the-high-court-of-hong-kong-2023-hkcfi-760-wednesday-15th-march-2023#decision_47123 (date of access 05.09.2026).
CMBICDHAW Investments Limited v CDH Fund V Limited Partnership and Others [2024] HKCA 516, 10 July 2024. Court of Appeal of the High Court of Hong Kong. Jus Mundi. URL: https://jusmundi.com/en/document/decision/en-cdh-fund-v-limited-partnership-cdh-grand-cattle-holdings-limited-management-li-lei-and-xiong-fei-v-cmbicdhaw-investments-limited-judgment-of-the-hong-kong-court-of-appeal-of-the-high-court-of-hong-kong-2024-hkca-516-wednesday-10th-july-2024#decision_66567 (date of access 05.09.2026).
Постанова Касаційного господарського суду у складі Верховного Суду від 14.08.2018 р. у справі № 910/5253/18. Єдиний державний реєстр судових рішень. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/76090352 (дата звернення: 05.09.2026).
Постанова Північного апеляційного господарського суду від 06.11.2018 р. у справі № 910/17566/17. Єдиний державний реєстр судових рішень. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/77914162 (дата звернення: 05.09.2026).
Постанова Касаційного господарського суду у складі Верховного Суду від 03.03.2020 р. у справі № 920/241/19. Єдиний державний реєстр судових рішень. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/88050865 (дата звернення: 05.09.2026).
Мальський М. М. Арбітражна угода: теоретичні та практичні аспекти. Львів : Літопис, 2013. 374 с.
Рекомендовані медіаційні застереження. Міжнародний комерційний арбітражний суд при Торгово-промисловій палаті України. International Commercial Arbitration Court. URL: https://icac.org.ua/en/mediation/rekomendovani-zasterezhennya/ (дата звернення: 05.09.2026).
Charter of the United Nations. United Nations. URL: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text (date of access 05.09.2026).
Statute of the International Court of Justice. International Court of Justice. URL: https://www.icj-cij.org/statute (date of access 05.09.2026).
Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions (Greece v. Great Britain). Judgment No. 2 of 30 August 1924. P.C.I.J. Series A, No. 2. Permanent Court of International Justice. International Court of Justice. URL: https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/permanent-court-of-international-justice/serie_A/A_02/06_Mavrommatis_en_Palestine_Arret.pdf (date of access 05.09.2026).
The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary / ed. by A. Zimmermann, C. J. Tams, K. Oellers-Frahm, C. Tomuschat. 3rd ed. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198814894.001.0001.
Nuclear Tests (Australia v. France). Judgment of 20 December 1974. I.C.J. Reports 1974. P. 253. International Court of Justice. URL: https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/58/058-19741220-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf (date of access 13.09.2026).
Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Niger). Judgment of 16 April 2013. I.C.J. Reports 2013. International Court of Justice. URL: https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/149/149-20130416-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf (date of access 05.09.2026).
Obligations concerning Negotiations relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament (Marshall Islands v. United Kingdom). Preliminary Objections, Judgment of 5 October 2016. I.C.J. Reports 2016. P. 833. International Court of Justice. URL: https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/160/160-20161005-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf (date of access 05.09.2026).
Obligations concerning Negotiations relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament (Marshall Islands v. India). Jurisdiction and Admissibility, Judgment of 5 October 2016. I.C.J. Reports 2016. P. 255. International Court of Justice. URL: https://icj-web.leman.un-icc.cloud/sites/default/files/case-related/158/158-20161005-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf (date of access 05.09.2026).
Obligations concerning Negotiations relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament (Marshall Islands v. Pakistan). Jurisdiction and Admissibility, Judgment of 5 October 2016. I.C.J. Reports 2016. P. 552. International Court of Justice. URL: https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/159/159-20161005-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf (date of access 05.09.2026).
Про торгово-промислові палати в Україні. Закон України від 02.12.1997 р. № 671/97-ВР. Верховна Рада України. Законодавство України. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/671/97-вр (дата звернення: 05.09.2026).
Hascher D. T. European Convention on International Commercial Arbitration of 1961: Commentary. Yearbook Commercial Arbitration. 2011. Vol. XXXVI. P. 504–562. International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA). URL: https://cdn.arbitration-icca.org/s3fs-public/document/media_document/media113534204360520hascher_commentary_on__the_european_convention_1961.pdf (date of access 05.09.2026).
Про зовнішньоекономічну діяльність. Закон України від 16.04.1991 р. № 959–XII. Верховна Рада України. Законодавство України. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/959-12 (дата звернення: 05.09.2026).
Analytical Commentary on Draft Text of a Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration : Report of the Secretary-General. A/CN.9/264. Vienna : United Nations, 25 March 1985. 79 p.
Parekh v Shah Jehan Cinemas (Pty) Ltd and Others, 1980 (1) SA 301 (D). Zalari Law Reports. URL: https://reports.zalari.co.zw/cases/1980-1-sa-301-d-parekh-v-shah-jehan-cinemas-pty-ltd-and-others (date of access 05.09.2026).
UNCITRAL 2012 Digest of Case Law on the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. New York : United Nations, 2012. V, 232 p. United Nations publication, Sales No. E.12.V.9. ISBN 978-92-1-133793-8.
Castro v. Tri Marine Fish Co., No. 17-35703, Order and Amended Opinion of 15 April 2019. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Justia US Law. URL: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/17-35703/17-35703-2019-04-15.html (date of access 05.09.2026).
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ievgen BOIARSKYI

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.