Small Claims in the Law and Doctrine of Civil Procedural Law of European Countries
Abstract
The concept of small claims, which is the novelty of Ukraine's civil proceedings, is being explored. For comparison, the legislation and doctrine of civil procedural law of France, Italy, Spain, Germany, Poland and Lithuania were analyzed. In particular, the provisions of the CPC of Ukraine were analyzed, which showed that there is no unity in the definition of insignificant cases and cases of insignificant complexity, and the criterion of the size of the claim price is used for their differentiation. The second criterion for determining minor cases is the categorical nature of the case, that is, the law defines an exhaustive list of cases that should be considered in summary proceedings, as well as those that cannot be heard in such proceedings.
The study of the relationship between the rates of court fees and the size of the cost of the claim in cases that can be considered in summary proceedings. This gave rise to the conclusions on the grounds for applying the provisions of the legislation on the subsistence minimum, which increases annually, creating the effect of unstable certainty of insignificant cases, in particular, the limit of such cases during 2017–2019 increased from 176 200 UAH to 192 100 UAH, which is 9.02 %.
A comparative study of the law and doctrine of EU law and selected European countries has led to the conclusion that, in most other countries and EU law, the criterion of the limitation of the amount of claims, clearly enshrined in the law, is applied. This gave rise to some conclusions about the criteria for defining minor disputes, in particular, the lack of uniform criteria for determining small cases. The cost of a lawsuit that cannot be exceeded is determined by small disputes in the EU, as well as in Germany and Lithuania, in other countries, specific categories of cases should be determined, which should be considered small under the law (Poland). Based on the comparative study, it was proposed to classify small disputes, in which the main criterion is the price of the claim.
References
Steele, E. H. (1981). The Historical Context of Small Claims Courts. Law and Social Inquiry (April), 6 (2), pp. 293–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1981.tb00356.x.
CEPEJ Report on «European judicial systems — Edition 2014 (2012 data): efficiency and quality of justice». (n.d.). Retrieved from Council of Europe: http://bit.ly/2W6zWIl.
Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 establishing a European Small Claims Procedure. (n.d.). Retrieved from Eur-Lex: http://bit.ly/33eQM9r.
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 of the European Parliament and the Council of 11 July 2007 establishing a European Small Claims Procedure and Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure. (n.d.). Retrieved from EUR-Lex: http://bit.ly/39PPNPk.
Regulation (EU) 2015/2421 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 establishing a European Small Claims Procedure and Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 creating a European order for payment procedure. (n.d.). Retrieved from EUR-Lex: http://bit.ly/2TOa1Ug.
Konstytutsiia Ukrainy vid 28.06.1996 № 254k/96–VR. (n.d.). Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: http://bit.ly/2LXJAqz.
Pro sudoustrii i status suddiv : Zakon Ukrainy vid 02.06.2016 № 1402–VIII. (n.d.). Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: http://bit.ly/2Qe6JYa.
Pro vnesennia zmin do Hospodarskoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy, Tsyvilnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy, Kodeksu administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy ta inshykh zakonodavchykh aktiv: Zakon Ukrainy vid 03.10.2017 № 2147–III. (n.d.). Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: http://bit.ly/2U79Yla.
Tsyvilnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 18.03.2004 № 1618–IV. (n.d.). Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: http://bit.ly/38wLHuJ.
Pro prozhytkovyi minimum : Zakon Ukrainy vid 15.07.1999 № 966–XIV. (n.d.). Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: http://bit.ly/2wTuNJ7.
Pro Derzhavnyi biudzhet Ukrainy na 2017 rik : Zakon Ukrainy vid 21.12.2016 № 1801–VIII. (n.d.). Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: http://bit.ly/3aTqoEB.
Pro Derzhavnyi biudzhet Ukrainy na 2018 rik : Zakon Ukrainy vid 07.12.2017 № 2246–VIII. (n.d.). Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: http://bit.ly/2IGb9CS.
Pro Derzhavnyi biudzhet Ukrainy na 2019 rik : Zakon Ukrainy vid 23.11.2018 № 2629–VIII. (n.d.). Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: http://bit.ly/2TLS3By.
Izarova, I, Fleiszar, R., & Vebraite, V. (2019). Access to Justice in Small Claims Procedure: Comparative Study of Civil Procedure in Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine. International Journal of Procedural Law, 9 (1), pp. 97–117.
Pro sudovyi zbir : Zakon Ukrainy vid 08.07.2011 № 3674–VI. (n.d.). Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: http://bit.ly/3d06mKG.
Hulko, B. I. (2018). Pro praktyku zastosuvannia Verkhovnym Sudom instytutu maloznachnykh sprav na stadii kasatsiinoho perehliadu. Pravo Ukrainy, 10, pp. 102–113.
Lesko, A. (2017, November 30). Maloznachnist sprav tsyvilnoi yurysdyktsii yak kryterii dlia yikh rozghliadu u sproshchenomu pozovnomu provadzhenni ta vidmovy u vidkrytti kasatsiinoho provadzhennia. Retrieved from Vyshcha rada pravosuddia: http://bit.ly/2QbTaZi.
Izarova, I. O., & Prytyka, Yu. D. (2019). Sproshchene pozovne provadzhennia tsyvilnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy: vyklyky pershoho roku zastosuvannia v sudovii praktytsi. Problemy zakonnosti, 145, pp. 51–67.
Vasylieva-Shalamova, Zh. V. (2018). Deiaki pytannia rozghliadu sprav u poriadku sproshchenoho provadzhennia. In Izarova, I., Fleishar, R., Khanyk-Pospolitak, R. (Eds.). Maloznachni spory: yevropeiskyi ta ukrainskyi dosvid vyrishennia. (pp. 20–25). Kyiv: Dakor.
Kolisnyk, O. V. (2018). Problemy vyznachennia kryterii maloznachnosti sprav. In Izarova, I., Fleishar, R., Khanyk-Pospolitak, R. (Eds.). Maloznachni spory: yevropeiskyi ta ukrainskyi dosvid vyrishennia. (pp. 46–51). Kyiv: Dakor.
Kravtsov, S. O. (2018). Deiaki praktychni aspekty rozghliadu maloznachnykh sporiv. In Izarova, I., Fleishar, R., Khanyk-Pospolitak, R. (Eds.). Maloznachni spory: yevropeiskyi ta ukrainskyi dosvid vyrishennia. (pp. 63–68). Kyiv: Dakor.
Panych, N. Yu. (2018). Maloznachni spravy zghidno ch. 6 st. 19 TsPK Ukrainy u porivnianni z § 495A TsPK Nimechchyny i ch. 1 st. 2 Rehlamentu (IeS) No 861/2007: Chy vdalas reforma? In Izarova, I., Fleishar, R., Khanyk-Pospolitak, R. (Eds.). Maloznachni spory: yevropeiskyi ta ukrainskyi dosvid vyrishennia. (pp. 120–133). Kyiv: Dakor.
Sakara, N. Yu. (2018). Pravo na kasatsiine oskarzhennia sudovykh rishen u maloznachnykh spravakh: problemy zakonodavchoho rehuliuvannia. In Izarova, I., Fleishar, R., Khanyk-Pospolitak, R. (Eds.). Maloznachni spory: yevropeiskyi ta ukrainskyi dosvid vyrishennia. (pp. 161–171). Kyiv: Dakor.
Uhrynovska, O. I. (2018). Sproshchene pozovne provadzhennia: osoblyvosti zakonodavchoi rehlamentatsii. In Izarova, I., Fleishar, R., Khanyk-Pospolitak, R. (Eds.). Maloznachni spory: yevropeiskyi ta ukrainskyi dosvid vyrishennia. (pp. 187–192). Kyiv: Dakor.
Yaroshenko, I. S. (2018). Okremi aspekty tlumachennia poniattia. In Izarova, I., Fleishar, R., Khanyk-Pospolitak, R. (Eds.). Maloznachni spory: yevropeiskyi ta ukrainskyi dosvid vyrishennia. (pp. 217–221). Kyiv: Dakor,
Commission Staff Working Document Impact Assessment Accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No. 861/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Small Claims Procedure and Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure. (n.d.). Retrieved from EUR-Lex: http://bit.ly/2TNmZS3.
Izarova, I. O. (2016). Reforma zahalnoievropeiskykh protsedur ta yii znachennia dlia podalshoho rozvytku tsyvilnoho protsesu YeS. Universytetski naukovi zapysky, 1 (57), pp. 80–89.
Izarova, I. O. (2014). Teoretychni zasady tsyvilnoho protsesu YeS. Kyiv: Dakor.
Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure. (n.d.). Retrieved from EUR-Lex: http://bit.ly/2Qealcx.
Zivilprozessordnung. (n.d.). Retrieved from Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz: http://bit.ly/2Qf8FQd.
Rechtspflege, Zivilgerichte (Fachserie 10, Reihe 2.1, Destatis 2017). Retrieved from Statistisches Bundesamt: http://bit.ly/2U1VSSi.
Vebraite, V. (2017). Special Procedures in Lithuanian Civil Procedure and Impact of EU Law on them. In Izarova, I. O., Khanyk-Pospolitak, R. Yu. (Eds.) Ukraina na shliakhu do Yevropy: reforma tsyvilnoho protsesualnoho zakonodavstva. (pp. 70–72). Kyiv: Dakor.
Vėbraitė, V. (2019). Some Important Features of Lithuania Civil Procedure. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 1 (2), pp. 45–51. Retrieved from: http://bit.ly/2w7DPCb; https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-2.1-a000007.
May, J, & Malczyk, M. (2019). European Small Claims Procedure and Its Place in the System of Polish Separate Proceedings. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 2 (3), pp. 36–52. Retrieved from: http://bit.ly/38KXmW7; https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-2.3-a000012.
Code de procédure civile Version consolidée au 1 janvier 2020. (n.d.). Retrieved from Légifrance: http://bit.ly/2vmQZLe.
Silvestri, E. (2018). Small Claims and Procedural Simplification: Evidence from Selected EU Legal Systems. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 1 (1), pp. 6–14. Retrieved from: http://bit.ly/2xBp0Z0.
Yngvesson, B., & Hennessey, P. (1975). Small Claims, Complex Disputes: A Review of the Small Claims Literature. Law & Society Review. Winter, 9 (2), pp. 219–274.
Code des procédures civiles dexécution. Version consolidée au 29 septembre 2019. (n.d.). Retrieved from Légifrance. http://bit.ly/2QsQKpp.
Silvestri, E. (2014). Italy: Simplification of Debt Collection in Italy — National and EU Perspectives. In Rijavec, V, Ivanc, T., Keresteš, T. (Eds). Simplification of Debt Collection in the EU. (pp. 347–61).
Prytyka, Yu. D. (2019). Alternatyvni sposoby vyrishennia sporiv. Kharkiv: Pravo.
