Terms of Forced Return and Expulsion of Foreigners and Stateless Persons by Bodies of the Border Guard Service in a Pandemic
Abstract
The article examines the doctrinal approaches to determining the legal nature of the terms of forced return and expulsion of foreigners and stateless persons by bodies of the border guard service. The analysis of domestic and foreign scientific views on time measurement in administrative proceedings has been carried out. The rules of the American and European system of termination of illegal stay of third-country nationals in connection with immigration detention, which is distinguished by its purpose and duration. The place of administrative deportation in the system of migration measures under Russian law is explained by the fact that it is an administrative punishment of foreign citizens and stateless persons who are subject to detention and are kept in specially designated premises. The peculiarities of temporal regulation and its significance in the application of coercive measures aimed at the return of a migrant in the context of the global spread of coronavirus infection are clarified. The allocation of material and procedural terms within the framework of which the state border guards exercise the powers of forced return and expulsion from the territory of Ukraine is reasoned. The focus on achieving the migration result reflects the material content of the terms allotted for departure and / or ensuring the departure of an illegal migrant from the country. The material expulsion terms are also associated with detention, which is applied according to the rules of administrative proceedings and is characterized by a significant duration, especially in a pandemic. The appointment of procedural terms is justified on the basis of the current norms of administrative-procedural legislation and is associated with the performance of the procedural actions necessary to be applied to the court and the phasing of administrative-jurisdictional proceedings. During the quarantine it is allowed to review the procedural terms in contrast to the material ones. Among the prospects of elaboration of the chosen topic, a comprehensive study of the normative regulation of time characteristics of immigration detention in accordance with the new administrative legislation and the return of foreigners (stateless persons) detected during their crossing the state border and entering the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine is proposed.
References
Temperaturnyi skryninh pasazhyriv. 2020. (N.d.) Retrieved from Uriadovyi kontaktnyi tsentr: http://bit.ly/3tk8HqS.
Tryvaie realizatsiia kompleksu orhanizatsiinykh ta praktychnykh zakhodiv shchodo zapobihannia rozpovsiudzhenniu na terytoriiu Ukrainy koronavirusu COVID-19 (13.03.2020). Retrieved from Derzhavna prykordonna sluzhba Ukrainy: http://bit.ly/3rOpG4u.
Kutsenko, V. V. (2012) Chas yak filosofska katehoriia: u poshukakh ekzystentsiinoi temporalnosti. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Filosofiia. Politolohiia, 110, 9–12.
Bilodid, I. K. (ed.) (1973) Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy : v 11 tt. AN URSR. Instytut movoznavstva (t. 9: R–T). Kyiv : Naukova dumka.
Busel, V. T. (ed.) (2005) Velykyi tlumachnyi slovnyk suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy: 250000. Kyiv ; Irpin : Perun.
Soroka, M. O. (2010) Poniattia «protsesualnyi strok» v administratyvnomu sudochynstvi. Aktualni problemy derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 1, 229–235. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/30FXLYj.
Diorditsa, I. V. (2012) Stroky zvernennia do administratyvnoho sudu: ohliad praktyky zastosuvannia protsesualnykh norm na prykladi pershoi ta apeliatsiinoi instantsii. Advokat, 5, 27–31.
Kodeks administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy: v red. Zakonu Ukrainy vid 03.10.2017 r. № 2147–VIII. (2017) Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 48, 436.
Arakelian, M. M. (2011) Osoblyvosti vyznachennia ta obchyslennia stroku zvernennia do administratyvnoho sudu. Aktualni pytannia derzhavy i prava, 58, 258–264.
Konventsiia pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod vid 04.11.1950 r. (N.d.) Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: http://bit.ly/2V1LT1v.
Ob obshhih standartah i procedurah, podlezhashhih primeneniju v gosudarstvah-chlenah dlja vozvrata nezakonno prebyvajushhih grazhdan tret'ih stran. Direktiva Evropejskogo Parlamenta i Soveta № 2008/115/ES ot 16.12.2008 g. (N.d.) Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: https://bit.ly/3leEE1b.
Diego Acosta Arcarazo, 'The Returns Directive: Possible Limits and Interpretation. Karin Zwaan (ed.), The Returns Directive: Possible Limits and Interpretation. (p. 7-24). SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2427747.
Wilsher, D. (2014) Immigration detention: law, history, politics. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
Alzhyr. Osoblyvosti po kraini. (N.d.) Retrieved from Departament konsulskoi sluzhby Ministerstva zakordonnykh sprav Ukrainy: http://bit.ly/3cvR28X.
Costello, C. (2012) Human Rights and the Elusive Universal Subject: Immigration Detention under International Human Rights and EU Law. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 19 (1), 257–303: https://doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.19.1.257.
Hernandez, D. M. (2008) Pursuant to Deportation: Latinos and Immigrant Detention. Latino Studies, 6, 35–63. https://doi.org/10.1057/lst.2008.2.
Koulish, R. (2017) Immigration Detention in the Risk Classification Assessment Era. Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal, 16 (1), 3–37.
Zubova, E. G. (2016) Mery administrativnogo prinuzhdenija, primenjaemye na deliktnoj osnove k inostrannym grazhdanam i licam bez grazhdanstva : dis. … kand. jurid. nauk : 12.00.14. Saratov.
Ob utverzhdenii Instrukcii ob organizacii dejatel'nosti pogranichnyh organov po administrativnomu vydvoreniju za predely Rossijskoj Federacii inostrannyh grazhdan ili lic bez grazhdanstva. Prikaz Federal'noj sluzhby bezopasnosti Rossijskoj Federacii ot 23.12.2008 g. № 631. (N.d.) Retrieved from Federal'naja sluzhba bezopasnosti Rossijskoj Federacii: https://bit.ly/3tiv14b.
Pro vnesennia zmin do deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shchodo udoskonalennia polozhen sudovoho zakhystu inozemtsiv ta osib bez hromadianstva i vrehuliuvannia okremykh pytan, poviazanykh z protydiieiu nelehalnii mihratsii. Zakon Ukrainy vid 19.05.2016 r. № 1379–VIII. (2016) Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 27, 521.
Instruktsiia pro prymusove povernennia i prymusove vydvorennia z Ukrainy inozemtsiv ta osib bez hromadianstva. Zatv. nakazom Ministerstva vnutrishnikh sprav Ukrainy, Administratsii Derzhavnoi prykordonnoi sluzhby Ukrainy, Sluzhby bezpeky Ukrainy 23.04.2012 r. № 353/271/150, u red. nakazu Ministerstva vnutrishnikh sprav Ukrainy, Sluzhby bezpeky Ukrainy 22.01.2018 № 38/77, zareiestr. v Ministerstvi yustytsii Ukrainy 21.05.2012 r. za № 806/21119. (N.d.) Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: http://bit.ly/3qME1Nl.
Rishennia Lychakivskoho raionnoho sudu m. Lvova vid 16.01.2020 r. u spravi № 463/399/20. (N.d.) Retrieved from Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen: http://bit.ly/30FVX1J.
Rishennia Lychakivskoho raionnoho sudu m. Lvova vid 16.01.2020 r. u spravi № 463/401/20. (N.d.) Retrieved from Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen: http://bit.ly/3cuHWt1.
Pro pravovyi status inozemtsiv ta osib bez hromadianstva : Zakon Ukrainy vid 22.09.2011 r. № 3773–VI. (N.d.) Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: http://bit.ly/3lh81zP.
Rozum, I. O. (2016) Dyskusiini aspekty poniattia ta sutnosti protsesualnykh strokiv u administratyvnomu protsesi. Yurydychnyi visnyk, 2, 93–99.
Pro vnesennia zmin do deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shchodo perebihu protsesualnykh strokiv pid chas dii karantynu, vstanovlenoho Kabinetom Ministriv Ukrainy z metoiu zapobihannia poshyrenniu koronavirusnoi khvoroby (COVID-19). Zakon Ukrainy vid 18.06.2020 r. № 731–IX. (2020) Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 46, 399.
