Influence of Subjective Civil Rights Protection on the Dynamics of Contractual Obligations
Abstract
The scientific article explores the influence of methods of protection of subjective civil rights on the dynamics of contractual binding legal relations. Scientific approaches to understanding the concepts of «protection» and «protection of civil rights» have been identified. Reference is made to the relevance of the concept of «protection of civil rights» as the application of a system of methods provided for by law aimed at «termination of violation, restoration or recognition of a civil right or compensation of damages caused to the entitled person». Features are described and the concept of ways to protect subjective civil rights is defined. The concepts of «means of protection» and «measures of protection» are distinguished. Special and general ways of civil rights are described. It is concluded that special ways of protecting civil rights are provided for in the legal rules governing specific legal relations, in particular with regard to contractual binding legal relations. It is determined that civil law grants every person the right to protection of his civil right in case of its violation, non-recognition or challenge. It is stated that certain types of contractual obligations apply means of protection, which are measures of liability. The relationship between «operational measures» and «methods of self-protection» has been studied, and it has been determined that operational measures are a form of self-protection methods, as they have a number of common features. It has been proven that any legal relationship is in the dynamics associated with legal facts from the moment of its occurrence to the moment of termination, which are mostly distant from each other in time and space. It is justified that both general and special ways of protecting civil rights are possible at the stage of the establishment of a contractual binding legal relationship. Along with the emergence of a legal relationship, the stages of change and termination of the legal relationship occupy a place.
References
Gribanov, V. P. (2001). Osushchestvleniye i zashchita grazhdanskikh prav (2nd ed.). Moskva: Statut.
Kozhevnikov, S. N. (1968). Mery zashchity v sovetskom prave (avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk). Sverdlovsk, 20 s.
Stoyakin, G. Ya. (1973). Mery zashchity v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave (avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk). Sverdlovsk, 22 s.
Spasibo-Fateyeva, I. V. (1998). Aktsionernyye obshchestva: korporativnyye pravootnosheniya. Kharkiv: Pravo.
Krasheninnikov, E. A., & Shevchenko, A. S. (1989). Okhranitelnyye pravootnosheniya i zashchita grazhdanskikh prav. Subyektivnoye pravo: problemy osushchestvleniya i zashchity. (pp. 48–51). Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dalnevost. un-ta.
Romovskaya, Z. V. (1985). Zashchita v sovetskom semeynom prave. Lvov: Vishcha shkola.
Tikhomirova, L. V. (1997). Yuridicheskaya entsiklopediya (Tikhomirov, M. Yu., ed.). Moskva.
Bodnar, T. V. (2007). Deiaki problemy zakhystu tsyvilnykh prav u dohovirnykh zoboviazanniakh. Universytetski naukovi zapysky, 2, pp. 113–118.
Hrynko, R. V. (2015). Zakhody operatyvnoho vplyvu u zoboviazalnykh pravovidnosynakh (dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk). Khmelnytskyi, 198 ark.
Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 16.01.2003 № 435–IV. (n.d.). Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: http://bit.ly/2w1seVb.
Levkov, A. A. (2002). Mery zashchity v rossiyskom prave (avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk). Volgograd, 28 s.
Bratus S. N. (1976). Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost i zakonnost (Ocherki teorii). Moskva: Yurid. lit. Retrieved from Universalnyy uchebnik: http://bit.ly/2vTYcCS.
Zaverukha, S. V. (2014). Tsyvilno-pravova vidpovidalnist za dohovorom kupivli-prodazhu (dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk). Khmelnytskyi, 217 ark.
Malein, N. S. (1993). O merakh otvetstvennosti. In Teoriya prava: novyye idei (Vyp. 3. pp. 45–53). Moskva: Izd-vo IGiP RAN.
Kharytonova, Ye. O., & Drishliuk, A. I. (Eds.) (2005). Tsyvilne pravo Ukrainy (v 3 kn., , knyha persha). Odesa: Yurydychna literatura.
Karkhalev, D. N. (2003). Mery zashchity i mery otvetstvennosti v grazhdanskom prave Rossii. (diss. … kand. yurid. nauk). Moskva, 180 l.
Yanovytska, H. B., & Kucher, V. O. (Eds.). (2011). Tsyvilne pravo Ukrainy. Lviv: Lvivskyi derzhavnyi universytet vnutrishnikh sprav.
Braginskiy, M. I., & Vitryanskiy, V. V. (2002). Dogovornoye pravo. Kniga pervaya: Obshchiye polozheniya. Moskva, Statut.
Khokhlov, V. A. (1997). Otvetstvennost za narusheniye dogovora po grazhdanskomu pravu. Toliatti: Volzhskiy universitet im. V. N. Tatishcheva.
Sergeyev, A. P., Tolstoi, Yu. K. (1997). Grazhdanskoye pravo (u 3 ch., chast 1), Moskva: Prospekt.
Stefanchuk, R. O. (2005). Tsyvilne pravo Ukrainy. Kyiv: Pretsedent.
Rodoman, T. O. (2015). Do pytannia sposobiv zakhystu tsyvilnykh prava ta interesiv u konteksti polozhen st. 16 Tsyvilnoho kodeksu Ukrainy. Sudova apeliatsiia, 4 (41), pp. 65–70.
Kot, O. O. (2017). Spetsialni sposoby zakhystu subiektyvnykh tsyvilnykh prav. Pravo Ukrainy, 1, pp. 91–100.
Berveno, S. M. (2006). Problemy dohovirnoho prava Ukrainy. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.
Antoniuk, O. I. (2004). Pravo uchasnykiv tsyvilnykh pravovidnosyn na samozakhyst (dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk). Kharkiv, 205 ark.
Savatye, R. (1972). Teoriya obyazatelstv. Yuridicheskiy i ekonomicheskiy ocherk (Khalfina, R. O., Trans.). Moskva: Progress.
Holubieva, N. Yu. (2013). Zoboviazannia u tsyvilnomu pravi Ukrainy: metodolohichni zasady pravovoho rehuliuvannia osib (avtoref. dys. … d-ra yuryd. nauk). Odesa, 40 s.
Hrynko, R. V. (2014). Zakhody operatyvnoho vplyvu ta dynamika zoboviazalnoho pravovidnoshennia. Universytetski naukovi zapysky, 2 (50), pp. 168–176.
Kot, O. (2016). Sposoby zakhystu dohovirnykh prav. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo, 11, pp. 13–18.
Cherepakhin, B. B. (2001). Pravopreyemstvo po sovetskomu grazhdanskomu pravu. Trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu. Moskva: Statut.
Krasavchikov, O. A. (1958). Yuridicheskiye fakty v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave. Moskva: Gosyurizdat.
Popondopulo, V. F. (1985). Dinamika obyazatelstvennogo pravootnosheniya i grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost. Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dalnevostochnogo un-ta.
Romashchenko, I. O. (2016). Do pytannia pro mozhlyvist vyznannia zminy pravovidnoshennia yak sposobu zakhystu zakhodom tsyvilno-pravovoi vidpovidalnosti. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia Pravo, 37 (2), pp. 46–49.
