Legal and Historical Prerequisites for the Transfer (Inheritance) of the Deceased Person Property to Public Legal Entities
Abstract
The article studies the peculiarities of participation in civil relations of such public legal entities as the state and the territorial community. It is established that according to part 2 of Article 2 of the Civil Code of Ukraine, along with legal persons of public law, they are assigned to subjects of public law. Full determination of the status of public entities in private law remains problematic. This is due to the dual status of these entities: as participants in public and private relations. It is stated that despite the fact that the State and territorial communities are primarily subjects of public law, they take part in civil relations, taking into account the signs of these relations defined in the Civil Code of Ukraine. The classification of public legal entities as special entities leads to their participation in civil relations through state authorities and other entities that are legal persons; representation of their interests by physical persons is not excluded. It is confirmed that the civil legal capability and legal capacity of public legal entities is reduced to the legal capacity of bodies acting in their interests. The acquisition of legal personality by public legal entities is carried out mainly in accordance with the norms of constitutional and administrative law. It is determined that the civil legal capacity of public legal entities is limited in scope. On the basis of the analysis of acts of legislation on inheritance of the Soviet and modern period, it is established that the current legislation provides for the maximum removal of public legal entities from the field of private law. This is manifested in hereditary relationships. Public law entities may acquire ownership of the property of the deceased if: 1) a will is drawn up in their favor; 2) if the property was not inherited by the heirs and by decision of the court is recognized as fictitious and becomes the property of the territorial community. It is confirmed that under Ukrainian law the transfer of fictitious property to communal property is not recognized as inheritance. Separately, it should be noted that before the entry into force of the Civil Code of Ukraine of 2003, fictitious property in Ukraine was inherited by the state, now by territorial communities.
References
Pankevych, R. (2017) Mainovi prava ta interesy derzhavy i terytorialnykh hromad: tsyvilno-pravovi aspekty. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo, 7, 20–25.
Spasybo-Fatieieva, I. V. (2010) Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar (poiasnennia, tlumachennia, rekomendatsii z vykorystanniam pozytsii vyshchykh sudovykh instantsii, Ministerstva yustytsii, naukovtsiv, fakhivtsiv). (t. 1: Zahalni polozhennia). Kharkiv : FO-P Kolisnyk A. A..
Dzera, Yu. M. (2010) Teoretyko-pravovi pidkhody shchodo uchasti derzhavy u tsyvilnykh vidnosynakh ta yii pravo subiektnosti. Forum prava, 1, 66–71. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/3fcngcs.
Spasybo-Fatieieva, I. V. (2006) Deiaki problemy, poviazani z uchastiu derzhavy Ukraina v tsyvilno-pravovykh vidnosynakh. Visnyk Akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy, 4 (47), 96–107.
Bordeniuk, V. V. (2014) Deiaki pidkhody do vyznachennia sutnosti tsyvilnoi pravozdatnosti terytorialnykh hromad. Derzhava i pravo. Yurydychni i politychni nauky, 66, 173–182.
Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 08.04.1999 r. u spravi № 1-1/99 za konstytutsiinymy podanniamy Vyshchoho arbitrazhnoho sudu Ukrainy ta Heneralnoi prokuratury Ukrainy shchodo ofitsiinoho tlumachennia polozhen statti 2 Arbitrazhnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy (sprava pro predstavnytstvo prokuraturoiu Ukrainy interesiv derzhavy v arbitrazhnomu sudi). (N.d.) Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: https://bit.ly/31gsEmM.
Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 16.04.2009 r. № 7-rp/2009 u spravi za konstytutsiinym podanniam Kharkivskoi miskoi rady shchodo ofitsiinoho tlumachennia polozhen chastyny druhoi statti 19, statti 144 Konstytutsii Ukrainy, statti 25, chastyny chotyrnadtsiatoi statti 46, chastyn pershoi, desiatoi statti 59 Zakonu Ukrainy «Pro mistseve samovriaduvannia v Ukraini» (sprava pro skasuvannia aktiv orhaniv mistsevoho samovriaduvannia). (N.d.) Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: https://bit.ly/39uqcO3.
Konstytutsiia Ukrainy vid 28.06.1996 r. № 254k/96-VR. (N.d.) Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: http://bit.ly/2LXJAqz.
Pechenyj, O. P. (2013) O subjektah nasledstvennyh pravootnoshenij. Izvestija IGJeA, 4 (90), 93–97.
Ob otmene nasledovanija. Dekret VCIK ot 27.04.1918 g. (N.d.) Retrieved from Istoricheskij fakul'tet MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova: https://bit.ly/3smRH3f.
Pro skasuvannia spadkuvannia. Dekret RNK Ukrainskoi RSR vid 11.03.1919 r. (1919) Zbirnyk postanov ta rozporiadzhen robitnyche-selianskoho uriadu Ukrainy, 24, 268.
Nikiforov, A. V. (2004) Pravovoe regulirovanie nasledovanija po zaveshhaniju v Rossijskoj Federacii. Dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. Moskva.
Demichev, A. A. (2014) Problemy nasledovanija vymorochnogo imushhestva v Rossijskoj Federacii. Juridicheskaja nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoj akademii MVD Rossii, 1 (25), 88–92.
Zaika, Yu. O., Riabokon, Ye. O. (2009) Spadkove pravo (Dzera, O. V., ed.). Kyiv : Yurinkom Inter.
Sergeev, A. P., Tolstoi, Ju. K. (2001) Grazhdanskoe pravo (3rd ed., tom 3). Moskva : PBOJuL L. V. Rozhnikov.
Logvin, R. B. (2016) Gosudarstvo kak subjekt nasledstvennogo prava. Zakonnost' i pravoporjadok v sovremennom obshhestve, 30, 13–16.
Zharkova, G. I. (2004) Pravovoe regulirovanie nasledovanija po zaveshhaniju v Rossijskoj Federacii. Dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. Moskva.
Zvid zakoniv tsyvilnykh Rosiiskoi Imperii 1832 roku (vydannia 1914 roku). (2009) In Stefanchuk, R. O., Stefanchuk, M. O. (eds.) Kodyfikatsiia tsyvilnoho zakonodavstva na ukrainskykh zemliakh. (t. 2, p. 9–238) Kyiv : Pravova yednist.
Zvid Tsyvilnyi kodeks URSR. Zatv. postanovoiu TsVK USRR vid 16.12.1922 r. (2009) In Stefanchuk, R. O., Stefanchuk, M. O. (eds.) Kodyfikatsiia tsyvilnoho zakonodavstva na ukrainskykh zemliakh. (t. 2, p. 679–733) Kyiv : Pravova yednist.
Kravchuk, A. G. (2003) Pravovaja sud'ba nasledstvennogo imushhestva. Dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. Moskva.
Alekseev, S. S. (2001) Voshozhdenie k pravu. Poiski i reshenija. Moskva : NORMA.
Osnovy tsyvilnoho zakonodavstva Soiuzu RSR ta soiuznykh respublik vid 8 hrudnia 1961 r. (2009) In Stefanchuk, R. O., Stefanchuk, M. O. (eds.) Kodyfikatsiia tsyvilnoho zakonodavstva na ukrainskykh zemliakh. (t. 2, p. 735–772) Kyiv : Pravova yednist.
Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainskoi RSR vid 18.07.1963 r. № 1540–VI. (N.d.) Retrieved from Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy: https://bit.ly/3lZqxxf.
Romovska, Z. V. (2001) Zapovidach mozhe vynahorodyty abo vidluchyty spadkoiemtsia. Notar, 5, 8–11.
Romovska, Z. V. (2009) Ukrainske tsyvilne pravo. Spadkove pravo. Kyiv : Alerta; KNY; TsUL.
Riabokon, Ye. O. (2002) Spadkove pravovidnoshennia v tsyvilnomu pravi. Avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk. Kyiv.
Pushkarov, O. Spadshchyna mozhe pereity u derzhavnu vlasnist, yakshcho vona vidkrylasia v period z 1 sichnia do 1 lypnia 2003 roku. (2014) Zemelnyi visnyk, 5. Retrieved from Natsionalna biblioteka Ukrainy im. V. I. Vernadskoho: https://bit.ly/3vQ3V6C.
Haritonova, E. O. (ed.) (1999) Grazhdanskij kodeks Ukrainy (nauchno-prakticheskij kommentarij). Xar'kov : Odissej.
Panfillo, E. A. (2012) Institut vymorochnogo imushhestva: problema opredelenija optimal'nogo pravopriemnika. Nasledstvennoe pravo, 3, 10–13.
Zvit sudiv pershoi instantsii pro rozghliad sprav u poriadku tsyvilnoho sudochynstva za 2018 rik. (N.d.) Retrieved from Sudova vlada Ukrainy: https://bit.ly/3tQdFMh.
Zvit sudiv pershoi instantsii pro rozghliad sprav u poriadku tsyvilnoho sudochynstva za 2019 rik. (N.d.) Retrieved from Sudova vlada Ukrainy: https://bit.ly/2NO2oNd.
